NEW

Black Lives Matter Bought $32 Million in Stocks

Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation (BLMGNF) has filed its long-awaited tax return for 2020, when it says it raised $90 million. The big question was what happened to...

Elitist JPMorgan Chase Board Confronted Over China, Paris Agreement

On Tuesday, National Legal and Policy Center presented a resolution at JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s annual shareholder meeting that would require the company take steps to...

USA TODAY: NLPC in ‘Long Overdue’ Fight Against Corporate Wokeness

In a front-page article (pay wall) published on Friday, May 13 by USA Today, reporter Jessica Guynn writes about conservative groups increasing their involvement at annual...

Verizon Slammed for Pushing CRT on Employees, Funding Extremists

On Thursday, National Legal and Policy Center presented a resolution at Verizon Communications Inc’s annual shareholder meeting that would require greater transparency and...

NLPC Targets Oil Giant ConocoPhillips over Carbon Tax Advocacy

On Tuesday, National Legal and Policy Center presented a resolution at ConocoPhillips Company’s annual shareholder meeting that would require greater transparency and itemization...

What Will Veterans Groups Do About the Charmain Bogue Scandal?

On March 24, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Inspector General released a report on violations of ethics rules by Charmain Bogue, a high department official, who resigned...

NLPC to Colgate-Palmolive: Stop Funding Al Sharpton’s Demogoguery

This morning National Legal and Policy Center presented a resolution at Colgate-Palmolive Company’s annual shareholder meeting that would require greater transparency and...

NLPC Chairman Confronts Warren Buffett at Berkshire Hathaway Annual Meeting

Peter Flaherty, chairman of National Legal and Policy Center, presented the organization's shareholder proposal to separate the roles of chairman and CEO at the annual meeting of...

Shareholder Activist Wants Warren Buffett to ‘Save’ Capitalism

Peter Flaherty, Chairman of the National Legal and Policy Center, will today present a shareholder proposal to separate the roles of Chairman and CEO at the Berkshire Hathaway...

WV Treasurer Calls on Unilever to End Ben & Jerry’s Israel Boycott

West Virginia Treasurer Riley Moore (pictured above) on Wednesday called on Unilever to end the boycott against Israel currently being conducted by its subsidiary Ben &...

Biden’s Retirement Money Grab Would Steer ERISA Funds to Political Causes

National Legal and Policy Center (NLPC) this week filed comments with theU.S. Department of Labor opposing a proposed rule that would allow retirement plan fiduciaries under ERISA-covered retirement plans to consider environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors in making investment decisions for employees’ retirement funds as a means of promoting collateral social policy or goals.

In its comments, NLPC opposed the Biden Administration’s proposal motivated by climate change policies, which would amend the rule issued by the Trump Administration in 2020, NLPC cited studies by experts that show that not only is it dubious that ESG funds do better than non-ESG funds, but that there are hidden fees making them even more expensive.

NLPC cited comments by former Deputy Secretary of Labor Patrick Pizzella who wrote, “Virtue-signaling with other people’s money is the icing on the cake of woke capitalism. Large sums of money accumulated from assembly-line workers, construction crews, independent contractors, and small-business owners are placed in the hands of fiduciaries who get to maximize risk rather than returns.”

“The responsibility of fiduciaries to retirees and employees is to maximize the return on their investments in their retirement funds, not to promote the latest social and political causes,” said Peter Flaherty, NLPC’s Chairman.

NLPC also proposed that the rule require fiduciaries to maximize disclosure of ESG funds to the account holders and to obtain their affirmative consent before investing in them. “Requiring affirmative opt-in consent rather than a negative opt-in process is pro-consumer in this and other contexts where consumers find that they have unwittingly been charged with goods or services they did not want,” said Paul Kamenar, NLPC’s counsel who filed the comments for NLPC.

Here is the public comment:

NLPC Comments on DOL ESG Rule Dec, 13 (1)

 

Previous

Next