NC Treasurer Answers NLPC; Will ‘Comply’ with Law on Ben & Jerry’s

North Carolina Treasurer Dale Folwell issued a press release on Friday in response to NLPC's Oct. 6th letter that requested "the immediate divestiture of Unilever holdings in all...

Walmart Exposed for Forcing Critical Race Theory on Executives, 1,000 Employees

The Manhattan Institute's Christopher Rufo has become the top watchdog and repository for information from whistleblowers about Corporate America's efforts to impose Critical...

Who’s Buying Hunter’s Art? NLPC’s Tom Anderson Offers a Possibility 10/12/21 America's Voice- Tom Anderson of the National Legal and Policy Center discusses the group's Complaint to the Inspector General of the Small...

Ben & Jerry’s Co-Founders Stumped When Asked About Anti-Israel Hypocrisy

The co-founders of Ben & Jerry's, Ben Cohen and Jerry Greenfield, no longer have anything to do with day-to-day management of the company they sold to Unilever over 20 years...

NLPC Files Complaint with SBA Inspector General

Following Sunday's report in the New York Post that the owner of the SoHo gallery that plans to feature and sell Hunter Biden's paintings received federal COVID aid upwards of...

Hunter Biden’s Art Dealer Has 2 Employees, But Got $580K in COVID Aid

Isabel Vincent reports today in the New York Post that the art gallery owner/dealer for rookie painter Hunter Biden, George Berges, received $500,000 from the Small Business...

JOHN STOSSEL: Why I Am Suing Facebook

Longtime reporter John Stossel, who now operates independently after having worked for all the major broadcast television networks, announced this week that he is suing Facebook....

McDonald’s CEO Bows to Green-Left; Gets Little Love in Return

McDonald's Corporation this week announced it would join the United Nations' meaningless "Race to Zero" program, which is intended to motivate businesses, organizations and...

Apple Whitewashes Its China Human Rights Record

On the heels of reports that slave labor is utilized in the supply chain for the manufacturing of its products — and that it lobbies in Washington DC to fend off penalties for doing so — Applereleased its “People and Environment in Our Supply Chain” review last week, which it produces annually.

In keeping with its past statements in response to claims of labor abuses — especially among its suppliers in China — Apple denied that its parts providers and product assemblers use coerced labor.

The annual report, which focused on fiscal year 2020, attempted to affix evidence and data to Apple’s refutation about labor abuses. Among its in-house findings:

  • Only 9 “core violations” of supplier codes of conduct found, down from 17 in 2019 – C/NET reports “Seven of the nine cases in 2020 related to working hours or labor data falsification. Overall, the company reported 93% compliance with its working-hours rules, which require suppliers to restrict workweeks to 60 hours.”
  • Interviewed 254,265 employees at supplier facilities about their work experiences, separate from their managers and overseers
  • 1,121 assessments in 53 countries: 842 Code of Conduct assessments, 279 smelter and refiner assessments
  • Rejected 8 percent of prospective suppliers for unwillingness to meet Apple’s standards
  • 21.5 million supplier employees trained on their rights since 2008

Undoubtedly Apple makes some effort to keep its suppliers accountable and makes some attempts to root out troubling practices.

But the bottom line is the company chooses to work with regimes with clear reputations for despicable human rights abuses. What does Apple expect assembly workers to say when they “interview” them — “I’m being mistreated”?

Citing discoveries made by human rights groups via satellite images, videos, and public statements by Chinese officials, last month the tech website The Information reported that it “found seven companies supplying device components, coatings and assembly services to Apple that are linked to alleged forced labor involving Uyghurs and other oppressed monitories in China. At least five of those companies received thousands of Uyghur and other minority workers at specific factory sites or subsidiaries that did work for Apple, the investigation found.”

With thousands of suppliers and raw materials providers and millions of employees, it is certainly likely that communist-driven abuses will fall outside of Apple’s awareness.

And the company is willful in its desire to look the other way, in order to maintain its access and affordability in China: Last month it was revealed that Apple is ceding control of the massive server farms that host its cloud computing for a Chinese firm, controlled by the communist government, to manage.

Until that attitude changes, expect Apple to continue to have human rights issues in the Far East.