NEW

Black Lives Matter Bought $32 Million in Stocks

Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation (BLMGNF) has filed its long-awaited tax return for 2020, when it says it raised $90 million. The big question was what happened to...

Elitist JPMorgan Chase Board Confronted Over China, Paris Agreement

On Tuesday, National Legal and Policy Center presented a resolution at JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s annual shareholder meeting that would require the company take steps to...

USA TODAY: NLPC in ‘Long Overdue’ Fight Against Corporate Wokeness

In a front-page article (pay wall) published on Friday, May 13 by USA Today, reporter Jessica Guynn writes about conservative groups increasing their involvement at annual...

Verizon Slammed for Pushing CRT on Employees, Funding Extremists

On Thursday, National Legal and Policy Center presented a resolution at Verizon Communications Inc’s annual shareholder meeting that would require greater transparency and...

NLPC Targets Oil Giant ConocoPhillips over Carbon Tax Advocacy

On Tuesday, National Legal and Policy Center presented a resolution at ConocoPhillips Company’s annual shareholder meeting that would require greater transparency and itemization...

What Will Veterans Groups Do About the Charmain Bogue Scandal?

On March 24, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Inspector General released a report on violations of ethics rules by Charmain Bogue, a high department official, who resigned...

NLPC to Colgate-Palmolive: Stop Funding Al Sharpton’s Demogoguery

This morning National Legal and Policy Center presented a resolution at Colgate-Palmolive Company’s annual shareholder meeting that would require greater transparency and...

NLPC Chairman Confronts Warren Buffett at Berkshire Hathaway Annual Meeting

Peter Flaherty, chairman of National Legal and Policy Center, presented the organization's shareholder proposal to separate the roles of chairman and CEO at the annual meeting of...

Shareholder Activist Wants Warren Buffett to ‘Save’ Capitalism

Peter Flaherty, Chairman of the National Legal and Policy Center, will today present a shareholder proposal to separate the roles of Chairman and CEO at the Berkshire Hathaway...

WV Treasurer Calls on Unilever to End Ben & Jerry’s Israel Boycott

West Virginia Treasurer Riley Moore (pictured above) on Wednesday called on Unilever to end the boycott against Israel currently being conducted by its subsidiary Ben &...

Unilever May Be Stuck With Ben And Jerry’s

Reeling from harsh criticism by major investors over his failed effort to purchase the healthcare division of GlaxoSmithKline, Unilever CEO Alan Jope now must sweat the likelihood that he won’t be able to unload anti-Semitic subsidiary Ben & Jerry’s, even if he wants to.

The British conglomerate has underperformed compared to many of its competitors in recent years, and Jope’s GSK acquisition plan was perceived as a desperate move to shore up the bottom line. He also said, during his overtures to GSK, that Unilever would likely sell off less profitable food product lines, which would include Ben & Jerry’s.

However, according to legal experts, the progressive political activism of the ice cream maker’s independent board of directors may make it radioactive to any potential suitors.

City A.M. reports:

Lawyers told the Sunday Telegraph that Unilever may struggle to offload Ben & Jerry’s due to details in the takeover contract in 2000 which handed control of decision-making to the firm, known for its strong political stands.

 

Ben & Jerry’s made headlines last year when it said it would stop selling ice cream in occupied Palestinian territories occupied by Israel, which it said was “inconsistent with our values for our product to be present within an internationally recognized illegal occupation.”

 

Jesse Fried, Dane Professor of Law at Harvard Law School, told The Sunday Telegraph that the new owner would “step into the shoes of Unilever and inherit the current board arrangement, as the merger agreement binds Unilever as well as any successors.”

 

Fried warned that a new owner could decide to litigate against the issue but the prospect of a legal battle with the Ben & Jerry’s board would risk sabotaging any potential purchase.

Compounding the situation is the expectation that Israel’s business regulatory agency, the Israel Competition Authority, will finally weigh in on Ben & Jerry’s discriminatory business practices.

“Antitrust Commissioner Dror Strum informed the Competition Authority that the move was illegal under the 2001 merger approval decision between Ben & Jerry’s and its parent company Unilever Global, as the contract prohibited any action that ‘may interfere with the franchisee’s activities in Israel,’” Israel Hayom reported over the weekend. “Ben & Jerry’s Israel franchisee Avi Zinger has reached out to the Competition Authority several times in recent months to intervene in the matter and demand answers from Unilever, but to no avail.”

Zinger said in December that Unilever and Ben & Jerry’s underestimated the backlash against their anti-Semitic move.

Jewish News Service reported last week that Unilever’s stock has plummeted 20.7 percent since Ben & Jerry’s announced its boycott last summer, amounting to a $26 billion loss.

Previous

Next

Tags: Alan Jope, anti-Semitism, Ben and Jerry's, Israel, Unilever