NEW

FBI Raids Rep. Henry Cuellar’s Home, Office; Investigation Has Deep Roots

Last week’s FBI raid of the home and office of Rep. Henry Cuellar (D-TX) most certainly has its roots in the scrutiny of a 2013 junket to Azerbaijan by ten members of Congress....

Unilever CEO Under Fire Over Wokeness, Mismanagement

Unilever CEO Alan Jope, already under fire for standing behind subsidiary Ben & Jerry’s planned boycott of Israel, is now being blasted by one of the parent company’s top...

Bobby Kotick Must Be Removed From Coca-Cola Board in Wake of Microsoft’s Acquisition of Activision

Activision CEO Bobby Kotick has sold his company to Microsoft, providing him with lucrative a way out, but without the stigma of resignation. Kotick has been under fire for over...

LA Times: BLM Founder Says She Had PTSD After Real Estate Revelations

Yesterday, the Los Angeles Times ran a lengthy front-page story about Black Lives Matter founder Patrisse Cullors. If it was meant to be sympathetic, it backfired. The paranoid...

NLPC Demands Alphabet Disclose Censorship Requests from Biden Admin

Are Google and YouTube engaging in “unconstitutional censorship” at the behest of the Biden administration? As a shareholder in Alphabet Inc., parent of Google and YouTube, NLPC...

Senators Want SEC to Probe Unilever Over Ben & Jerry’s Israel Boycott

Three members of the Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee want the Securities and Exchange Commission to investigate whether Unilever, parent company of Ben &...

PRO-ISRAEL GROUP: Ben & Jerry’s Chairwoman is ‘Anti-Semite of the Year’

Following online voting that lasted weeks to select between three nominees, activist website StopAntisemitism.org announced this week that Ben & Jerry's chairwoman Anuradha...

Illinois Divests from Unilever over Ben & Jerry’s Boycott of Israel

The Illinois Investment Policy Board, which ensures that investment of public money does not occur in entities that are prohibited from investment by Illinois law, voted on...

Soros Funds Radical Activist to Elect Radical DAs

The New York Post's Isabel Vincent reported Thursday that billionaire Hungarian progressive philanthropist George Soros has used a criminal justice reform activist to funnel...

Double Standard at Work: More Leniency for Clinesmith

Ex-FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith, who doctored an email to justify spying on a Trump campaign advisor, has been restored to “good standing” by the District of Columbia Bar...

Is Facebook an Arm of the Government and Therefore Subject to the First Amendment?

With the explosion of revelations from the release of the emails of Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectiousness Diseases at the National Institutes of Health, it has been discovered that Facebook is censoring users’ posts of those public records, according to Reclaim the Net.

The emails published last week by Buzzfeed and the Washington Post showed Fauci — the COVID-19 “expert” whose profile has been boosted by voluminous appearances on mainstream media news outlets — taking contradictory stances on the issues of masks and quashing evidence that the virus originated at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China. The emails undermined several other narratives that Fauci and the federal government have rammed down the throats of Americans, who have been forced to suffer under lockdowns and economic destruction, attributed to the threat of the coronavirus.

Facebook and other social media companies have been a huge part of driving that narrative. The emails showed that CEO Mark Zuckerberg communicated directly with Fauci and informed him of his plans to start a virus information resource on Facebook, which the doctor encouraged. Throughout the pandemic Facebook has censored posts by its customers of anything that it has deemed “misinformation” about the pandemic, including questioning the use of masks and discussions about the origins of the virus.

Facebook’s fact-checkers also used a letter signed by “27 eminent health experts” — published in the prestigious medical journal The Lancet — which attempted to debunk the Wuhan lab virus origin theory, as the basis to justify censoring posts that questioned the “natural” evolution narrative of the virus’s transition from animals to humans. The composition, signatories, and publication of the letter were engineered by Peter Daszak, whose non-profit Ecohealth Alliance received funding from NIH and directed it to the Wuhan lab.

Now even the first-hand evidence of Fauci’s emails themselves, are censor-able materials according to Facebook. One example cited by Reclaim the Net shows former New York Times reporter Alex Berenson — among the few journalists who have questioned the government narrative on issues related to the virus — showing posts that were censored because they “didn’t follow (Facebook’s) community standards.”

“The open alliance between Big Tech and government agencies on #covid raises all sorts of questions,” Berenson wrote, “especially this one — if @Facebook is serving as an arm of the government, why doesn’t the First Amendment apply to it?”

Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, a Republican who as an attorney argued constitutional issues before the Supreme Court, asked similar questions in an appearance on Fox News on Sunday:

These latest breakthroughs have real consequences because it now is clear that Facebook was operating at the direction of and in the direct benefit of the federal government and operating as the government’s censor, utilizing their monopoly position to censor on behalf of the government…

If you went out and posted the facts that led a year ago to the very strong likelihood that the COVID virus escaped from a Chinese government lab in Wuhan, China, if you posted that a year ago and they took it down, I think there’s a very good argument you have a cause of action against Facebook.

Facebook would ordinarily say, ‘We’re a private company, we’re not liable.’

Well, you know what, when they act at the behest of the government, when they contact [Anthony] Fauci when they say, ‘Should we censor this?’ and Fauci says, ‘Yes’ and they censor it for the federal government and then magically when the government changes its mind, and say, ‘Oh, all those facts that were there a year ago, now you’re allowed to talk about it,’ they stopped censoring it with a flip of a switch, that lays a very strong argument that Facebook is operating as a state agency and that opens very significant legal liability.

Previous

Next