TEAMSTERS (IBT)
Judge Rejects Emergency Trusteeship of Pennsylvania Local
U.S. Dist. Judge John Padova Dec. 28 ordered the Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters
and James P. Hoffa to return control of IBT Local
115 in Philadelphia to its duly elected officers, finding no emergency
situation warranting imposition of a trusteeship without a hearing. Temporarily
enjoining Hoffa from exercising the emergency trusteeship that was imposed
on the local in Nov., Padova ruled that the information available to Hoffa
when he appointed an emergency trustee "does not support a reasonable or
good faith belief that an emergency situation existed."
Padova emphasized that he was not looking at the truth of IBT's charges against the local or the propriety of the leadership of Local 115. "Rather, the sole question this court is deciding is whether the international removed plaintiffs from office and imposed the emergency trusteeship in a manner consistent with the democratic process embodied in the legislative scheme of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act," and the Teamsters' constitution and bylaws, the judge wrote.
Citing allegations of abuse of members' rights and failure to protect union finances, Hoffa Nov. 15 ordered the trusteeship of Local 115 and the removal of secretary-treasurer John P. Morris, the local's principal executive officer, as well as several members of the local's executive board. Morris was also removed from his other positions as president of the Pa. Conference of Teamsters and president of Joint Council 53. Morris previously was an int'l vice president for the eastern region under former IBT President Ron Carey. In the Teamsters 1996 election, he ran on the slate headed by Carey.
In a notice informing the officers of the reasons for the trusteeship, Hoffa specifically charged that Morris and his business agents viciously abused, physically threatened, and physically assaulted members Morris viewed as disloyal. The notice further claimed that Morris was preparing to wage a war against his enemies and directed Local 115 to purchase stun guns, military clothing, and a variety of tractors, trailers, and buses. The notice also charged Morris with various financial improprieties and alleged that he instigated the termination of 12 members from their jobs at a Kurz-Hastings plant because of suspected disloyalty.
One week after the trusteeship was imposed, the appointed trustee scheduled a formal hearing for Dec. 9, but the local requested that the hearing be postponed. Morris and the other terminated officers filed suit, alleging that IBT violated the LMRDA by imposing a trusteeship without a prior hearing and asking the court to issue a preliminary injunction. IBT has scheduled a hearing for Jan. 5-7, 2000, before a three-member panel that will make a recommendation to Hoffa on whether a trusteeship should be imposed. IBT's constitution provides that once the case is heard, the panel must issue a report to Hoffa within 60 days. Hoffa then has 15 days to make a decision. That decision can be appealed to the union's general executive board.
In finding that an emergency situation did not exist in this case, Padova explained that most of the international's charges are "longstanding: many are not dated to a specific point in time, and many others are noted to have gone on for years. Most of the charges, therefore, do not describe situations that appeared to be developing suddenly and unexpectedly, and therefore, the circumstances do not reasonably appear to demand immediate action." As an example, Padova cited that IBT alleged various financial improprieties, but it audited the local's finances in May and June 1999 and did nothing about the results for five months. Also, the international alleged that there was an emergency because Morris was stockpiling weapons and military supplies and making statements about an impending war. "The local purchased these materials prior to the June audit," Padova said. "Regardless of the true purposes of these materials, the IBT again waited over five months before acting on this information."
Padova also noted that since 1993 eight emergency trusteeships have been imposed by the Teamsters and six of those cases were based on a report and recommendation by the Independent Review Board. In one case where there was no IRB report, the trusteeship was imposed based on a request by the local's executive board. In the other case, Hoffa imposed the trusteeship two months after his attempts to obviate the need for a trusteeship failed. "Thus, in all eight prior cases of emergency trusteeships, the general president based his decision to institute the trusteeship on more substantial information than was available in the instant case," Padova wrote. "Here, by contrast, Hoffa lacked an IRB report." [BNA 12/30/99]
Union Corruption Update is made possible by the generous contributions from readers like you. Thank you.
In addition to the unions and organizations covered in this Union Corruption Update, readers can look forward to news and information on other corrupt and abusive unions in future editions.
All back issues of the Union Corruption Update can be viewed at NLPC's website (www.nlpc.org). Also available is a union-by-union and state-by-state index of all Union Corruption Update articles.
If you have story ideas or suggestions for future editions of Union Corruption Update, please email NLPC at nlpc@nlpc.org. Thank you.
Union Corruption Update is part of NLPC's Organized Labor Accountability Project which is investigating and exposing corruption and extremism in the Teamsters, LIUNA, AFL-CIO and many other union organizations. NLPC is a nonpartisan, nonprofit foundation promoting ethics and accountability in government through research, education and legal action.
Union Corruption Update Article Index (by Union)
Union Corruption Update Article Index (by State)
Organized Labor Accountability Project