This study analyzes the political activity of the 20 largest union and labor organization political action committees (PACs) in the 1997-98 election cycle. The Top 20 Union PACs were ascertained by the amount of total disbursements this cycle. This study examined every contribution given to federal candidates for U.S. House and U.S. Senate by the Top 20 Union PACs from January 1, 1997 to August 31, 1998. In all, 20 months of 20 unions or 400 months of data. There are five categories of recipients to increase the information's usability: (1) Top 20 House Recipients, (2) Top 20 Senate Recipients, (3) Top 20 House Incumbent Recipients, (4) Top 20 House Challenger Recipients, and (5) Top 20 Republican Recipients. The data source for this study is the Federal Election Commission, 999 E Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20463.
This study looks at union PACs only. That means all this money
was voluntarily contributed to the Top 20 Union PACs. Mandatory union
dues are not directly reflected in this study. However, since most
union PACs have substantial overhead cost subsidized by their connected
union or labor organization, mandatory union dues do aid union PACs in
these political activities. The sums in this study, although large, are
a small fraction of political activity, such as “soft money” and field
workers, that is legally undertaken by unions directly -- without the strict
PAC reporting requirements.
Purpose
With the heavy involvement of unions and labor organizations in the
1996 election, this study seeks to answer a basic question: Which
candidates are top union PACs investing in this election?
Key Points Learned from this Study
To see the Methodology of how this study was conducted click here.
To return to the index of The Top 20 from the Top
20 study click here.