National Legal and Policy Center
Organized Labor Accountability Project
The Top 20 from the Top 20 of 2000
www.nlpc.org
INTRODUCTION
This study analyzes the political activity of the 20
largest union political action committees (PACs) in the 1999-2000 election
cycle. The Top 20 Union PACs were ascertained by the amount of
total disbursements this cycle. This study examined every contribution
given to federal candidates for U.S. House and U.S. Senate by the Top 20
Union PACs from January 1, 1999 to August 31, 2000. In all, 20 months
of 20 unions or 400 months of data. There are five categories of
recipients to increase the information's usability: (1) Top
20 House Recipients, (2) Top 20 Senate Recipients,
(3) Top 20 House Incumbent Recipients, (4) Top
20 House Challenger Recipients, and (5) Top 20 Republican
Recipients. The data source for this study is the Federal Election
Commission, 999 E Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20463, which is also available
at <http://www.fecinfo.com>.
This study looks at union PACs only. That means all this money
was voluntarily contributed to the Top 20 Union PACs. Mandatory union
dues are not directly reflected in this study. However, since most
union PACs have substantial overhead cost subsidized by their connected
union or labor organization, mandatory union dues do aid union PACs in
these political activities. The sums in this study, although large, are
a small fraction of political activity, such as “soft money” and field
workers, that is legally undertaken by unions directly -- without the strict
PAC reporting requirements.
Purpose
This study seeks to answer a basic question: Which
candidates are top union PACs investing in this election?
Key Points Learned from this Study
-
Incumbents Dominate. Only six of the Top 20 House Recipients are
non-incumbents challenging an incumbent or running for an open seat.
That number drops to only five if you take account of the fact that former-Rep.
Scotty Baesler (KY-06) is running for his old seat that he held from
1993 to 1998 and then vacated in a losing bid for the U.S. Senate in 1998.
-
Ohio River Battle Ground. While Top 20 recipients are scattered
across the map, a multi-state concentration on the Ohio River Valley stands
out. Six districts that border the Ohio River made one of the Top
Lists: IN-09, KY-01,
KY-03, OH-06,
OH-18, WV-02,
and there are a few more nearby such as KY-06
and OH-12.
-
Power Begets Power. Top Democratic leaders, such as Minority Whip
David Bonior (MI-10) and Appropriations Committee
Ranking Member David Obey (WI-07), were rewarded
with large amounts of contributions. Somewhat surprisingly, however, Minority
Leader Richard Gephardt (MO-03) and Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee
Chairman Patrick Kennedy (RI-01) failed to make it into the Top 20 (both
just missing with totals of $118,000 and $113,000, respectively).
Gephardt did have a fair amount of contributions to the Democratic Leader's
Victory Fund 2000 committee, but those contributions were not included
in this study because they are not technically contributions to a federal
candidate.
-
Unionist Candidates Get Support. Not surprisingly, two Steelworkers
on the ballot this November made the Top 20 House Challenger list. Democrat
Greg Goodnight, who works at a specialty
steel manufacturer in Kokomo, Indiana, is challenging incumbent Rep. Steve
Buyer (IN-05). Democrat Ed O'Brien, an former
official of a Bethlehem Steel local, is challenging freshman Rep. Pat Toomey
(PA-15).
-
Unions Favor Democrats. No surprise here. Not one Republican
made it on to any of the Top 20 lists. Thus the inclusion of a separate
Top 20 Republican list.
About NLPC
This study is part of NLPC's Organized
Labor Accountability Project which is investigating and exposing corruption
and abuses in the Teamsters, Laborers, AFL-CIO and other labor organizations.
NLPC publishes a fortnightly newsletter, Union
Corruption Update, that details union corruption
in many of the unions included in this report; past articles may
found by NLPC's union index and
state index. For more about
NLPC visit <http://www.nlpc.org>.
To see the Methodology of how this study was conducted
click here.
To return to the index of The Top 20 from the Top
20 study click here.