National Legal and Policy Center -- Legal Services Accountability Project
 
LSAP REPORT
 
Issue # 52 -- April 11, 1997


 
Legal Services Abuses in New York V
Programs in New York that receive funding from the federal Legal Services Corporation (LSC) continue to engage in controversial litigation on behalf of undeserving individuals at the expense of meeting the poor’s true legal needs. Most shockingly, LSC-funded lawyers are still thwarting drug-related evictions from public and private housing. Although Congress passed restrictions last year prohibiting LSC grantees from representing individuals in  drug-related evictions, legal services lawyers have been able to exploit loopholes in the law to continue their involvement in such cases.
 

Stops Eviction of Woman Arrested for Dealing Crack

In August 1996, Brooklyn Legal Services stopped the eviction of a woman even though police found 54 vials of crack cocaine and drug packaging during a raid on her apartment. Following the raid which took place on Christmas Day 1995, the Clifton Court apartment complex initiated eviction proceedings against tenant Karen Williams who police arrested along with seven others for drug dealing. However, Brooklyn Legal Services thwarted the eviction. They argued that the apartment owners failed to definitively prove that Williams was dealing drugs despite the discovery of five dozen vials of crack. BLS claimed that the presence of illegal drugs in Williams apartment -- which was enough for police to arrest her -- was insufficient to justify her eviction.
 
See Bill Alden, “Court Blocks Drug-Related Eviction,” New York Law Journal, August 14, 1996, pg. 1
 

Tries to Stop Expulsion of Violent Man From Private Care Facility

In 1996, Nassau/Suffolk Law Services Committee of Long Island sued a private mental health care facility for trying to evict a violent resident. Abbey Island Park Manor sought to expel Marcos Lopez for refusing to follow the treatment program, verbally and physically abusing staff, terrorizing customers at a nearby supermarket with aggressive panhandling and sitting on the steps of the facility trying to throw residents down the stairs. However, Nassau/Suffolk lawyers tried to stop his expulsion on the trivial grounds that the termination notice incorrectly listed the date of Lopez’ admission. The state court rejected the claim, ruling that the typo didn’t render the notice defective.
 
See Abbey Island Park Manor v. Lopez, 646 N.Y.S.2d 971, 1996
 

College That Expelled Failing Student Sued For Violating ADA

In 1995, Legal Services of Central New York sued a college alleging that its expulsion of a student for academic incompetence violated the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA). The student in question, Rosemary Goodwin, was enrolled in the Occupational Therapy Program at Keuka College. She was expelled from the program in the fall of 1992 after failing to fulfill key parts of the program and leaving her field assignment after an argument with the supervisor. Legal Services of Central New York sued the college claiming that they discriminated against Goodwin by failing to take into account her learning disability. However, Goodwin was not diagnosed as having a disability until months after her expulsion. A federal court rejected legal services discrimination claim because the college could not be held responsible for a handicap they were not even aware of. Furthermore, the court ruled that she was failed for valid academic reasons. In a final attempt to win their case, Legal Services then claimed that Keuka College discriminated against Goodwin by rejecting her readmission after the school was informed of her disability. Legal Services argued that although the school expelled Goodwin for non-discriminatory reasons, they were obligated to readmit her due to her handicap. The court ruled that a student failed for academic reasons is not entitled under the ADA to readmission.
 
See Goodwin v. Keuka College, 929 F. Supp. 90, U.S. Dist. Ct., 1995
 

Seeks Federal Disability For Man Too Tired To Work

In 1996, Neighborhood Legal Services of Buffalo tried to get a man Supplemental Security (SSI) benefits on the grounds that his history of chronic alcoholism made him too tired and nervous to work. Although the man had a problem with seizures due to his drinking and was limited in the kinds of activity he could perform, doctors determined he was still capable of working in a variety of jobs. However, legal services claimed that he did not feel well and was often fatigued which prevented him from working. A federal judge rejected the argument, ruling that “Not quite feeling up to par and fatigue can hardly be described as significantly diminishing one’s ability to work.”
 
See Johnson v. Chater, U.S. Dist. Ct., 1996



 

Email NLPC

LSAP Report Issue Index

Legal Services Accountability Project

NLPC Home Page